Co-written with Sean Vernell, national FE negotiator
The decision to ‘pause’ the action in Higher Education is not a matter simply for those colleagues in HE. It is a concern for those who work in FE too. There are two clear issues with the pausing of the action. First there is a question of tactics. Employers always try and get the union to pause whilst negotiations take place. Very rarely they do so because there is a real offer on the table that could reach a settlement. The employer raises the question of pausing the action because they are under pressure and are looking for ways to relieve that pressure.

This is why it is tactically naïve and irresponsible to call off action that has put our negotiators in a strong position to win a significant deal, especially when the action is gaining momentum. Pausing action invites the employers to regroup so that they can go back on the offensive. This is precisely what happened when the RMT and CWU paused strikes for talks. The employers took this as a signal to impose more redundancies, smash existing agreements and make no movement over pay.
Those who have been involved in strike action over the last few years in FE will be all too familiar with ‘pausing disputes’ for talks, usually advised by UCU HQ or regional offices. Rarely has pausing disputes, when they have just started building momentum, gained any meaningful deals.
The second issue with pausing the strike in HE that is of concern for those in FE is the blatant disregard for UCU’s democratic structures. It is extraordinary that the General Secretary agreed to call off the action without consulting the HEC first or better still to consult members. This ‘we know best’ approach to leadership is one that will only lead to frustration and anger amongst those who have struck, picketed, and marched to pursue their claims. If UCU is to be a ‘member led union’ not just in name but in practice, then it must always allow those who are making the sacrifice to determine their own futures.
In Further Education, as we begin our campaign to win a nationally aggregated ballot so that we can strike over, pay, workload and a national bargaining framework, we must be alert to what is taking place in HE.
Unfortunately, as is mentioned above, what took place on Friday is not something peculiar to UCU – it is something that is all too common within other unions.
Trade Union Leaders believe that their members do not have the determination and stamina to launch a fight that can win. This stems from their acceptance of the parameters of what is possible according to what the employers and government tell us is possible.
There has never been a better time to fight. The government is in crisis. The employers are deeply divided over Europe. They have no strategy on how to resolve the cost-of-living crisis accept to go into attack mode. But our side has shown within UCU, and across the trade union movement as a whole, that working people have the will, the organisation and determination to resist these attacks on a scale that we have not seen in a generation.
Our leaders need to match up to their sacrifice and commitment and not take it for granted.